|
Jesus
H. Christ
The Passion — Mel Gibson's bloody mess
By
David Edelstein
Ever
since his star began to rise after the
1979 Australian thriller Mad Max, Mel Gibson
hasn't seemed fully alive on screen unless
he's being tortured and mutilated. In the
Road Warrior and Lethal Weapon films, as
well as such one-shots as Conspiracy Theory
(1997) and The Patriot (2000), Gibson courted
martyrdom, and he achieved it. He won an
Oscar for his labors in Braveheart (1995),
which ends with its hero managing to scream "FREEEEE-DOM!!" as
he's drawn and quartered. Gibson snatched
the pulp movie Payback (1999) away from its
writer-director, Brian Helgeland, to make
the torture of his character even more gruelingly
explicit: He added shots of his toes being
smashed by an iron hammer. Payback: That's
what almost all of Gibson's movies are about
(including his 1990 Hamlet.) Even if he begins
as a man of peace, Mad Mel ends as a savage
revenger.
A devout Catholic-albeit one who believes
that Vatican II, which formally absolved
the Jews of responsibility for the death
of Jesus, is illegitimate-Gibson has said
that what moves him most about the Christ
story is that Jesus was whipped, scourged,
mocked, spat on, had spikes driven through
his hands and feet, and was left to die on
the cross-and that he didn't think of payback;
he thought of forgiveness. But by wallowing
in his torture and death for two hours, the
director of The Passion of the Christ (Newmarket)
suggests that he's thinking of anything but.
Gibson
had an ingenious idea for promoting his
Passion: as the film that the Jews don't
want you to see. Now watch those lines form!
Bad reviews won't matter, either, since Gibson
has called his critics "the forces of
Satan" or, more charitably, the "dupes
of Satan." After Gibson's pre-emptive
blasts, an attack on his Passion will be
interpreted by some as an attack on their
religious beliefs instead of on filmmaking
that is theologically, morally, and-by the
way-artistically suspect.
As you probably know, The Passion of the
Christ recounts the last 12 hours of the
life of Jesus of Nazareth (played by the
lean, high-cheekboned Jim Caviezel), with
flashbacks to the Last Supper and a few shots
of the little-boy Jesus being hugged by his
mother, Mary. (The latter are cross-cut with
spikes being hammered through his hands.)
The lashes of the soldiers (dispatched by
the Jewish priesthood) begin about 15 minutes
into the film; by the time Jesus is dragged
into the presence of the Roman governor Pontius
Pilate (the Bulgarian actor Hristo Naumov
Shopov), his face has already been smashed
to a pulp.
Pilate, whom historians identify as a surpassingly
cruel ruler responsible for crucifying many
thousands to maintain his authority, is portrayed
as a sorrowful, even-tempered man whose wife
(Claudia Gerini) shows acts of loving kindness
toward Mary (Maia Morgenstern) and Mary Magdalene
(Monica Bellucci). Pilate is shocked by the
Jews' brutality and by the determination
of the priest Caiphas (Mattia Sbragia) to
see this so-called blasphemer executed. While
Pilate wrinkles his forehead, searching his
tender conscience, sundry Jews lean into
the camera and hiss or keen through rotted
teeth.
I know, it sounds like a Monty Python movie.
You're thinking there must be something to
The Passion of the Christ besides watching
a man tortured to death, right? Actually,
no: This is a two-hour-and-six-minute snuff
movie-The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre-that thinks
it's an act of faith. For Gibson, Jesus is
defined not by his teachings in life-by his
message of mercy, social justice, and self-abnegation,
some of it rooted in the Jewish Torah, much
of it defiantly personal-but by the manner
of his execution.
That doesn't exactly put him outside the
mainstream: The idea that Jesus died for
the sins of mankind is one of the central
tenets of Christian faith. But Gibson has
chosen those sections of the Gospels (especially
the Gospel of Matthew) that reflect the tension
between Jews and Christians 50 years after
the crucifixion, when the new religion's
proselytizers were trying to convert, rather
than incite, the Roman authorities. This
is the sort of passion play that makes people
mad.
Gibson uses every weapon in his cinematic
arsenal to drive home the agony of those
last dozen hours. While his mother and Mary
Magdalene watch, Jesus is lashed until his
entire body is covered in bloody crisscrossing
canals. When he rises, amazing the Roman
soldiers with his stamina, they go for the
scourges, which rip and puncture his flesh
in slow motion-all while the Romans and the
Jews cackle wildly. Carrying his cross, he
falls again and again in slow motion on his
swollen, battered body while the soundtrack
reverberates with heavy, Dolby-ized thuds.
It is almost a relief when the spikes are
driven into his hands and feet-at least it
means that his pain is almost over.
What does this protracted exercise in sado-masochism
have to do with Christian faith? I'm asking;
I don't know. Gibson's revenge movies end
with payback-or, in Braveheart, the promise
of payback to come. When Jesus is resurrected,
his expression is hard, and, as he moves
toward the entrance to his tomb, the camera
lingers on a round hole in his hand that
goes all the way through. Gibson's Jesus
reminded me of the Terminator-he could be
the Christianator-heading out into the world
to spread the bloody news. Next stop: the
Crusades.
(From: www.slate.com)
|